GoPro HERO vs AKASO Brave 4: Which Beginner Action Camera Is Better?
PublishedIf you buy through an affiliate link in this article, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The quick verdict
The GoPro HERO produced the better footage in my side by side comparison. Its image was sharper and more balanced, the view was wider, and stabilization applied through GoPro Quik was much more useful.
The AKASO Brave 4 made sense when cost, replaceable batteries, included accessories, or buying several camera angles mattered more. I would accept its weaker image only when those advantages solved a specific problem.
Compare the GoPro HERO 4K or check the AKASO Brave 4 kit. This test covers the small 2024 HERO and the Brave 4, rather than a HERO Black or Brave 4 Pro.
Watch the full video
The differences that mattered in my test
| Category | GoPro HERO 2024 | AKASO Brave 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price around the test | About $180 to $200 | About $60 to $80 |
| Picture I preferred | Sharper and more balanced | Softer, washed out, and often overexposed |
| Stabilization workflow | HyperSmooth through the Quik app | Electronic stabilization in the camera |
| Battery | Built in and recharged in the camera | Replaceable |
| Water use | Rated to 5m / 16ft without a housing | Rated to 40m / 131ft with the specified housing |
| Included accessories | Basic mounting hardware in my package | More mounts and a remote in my kit |
| Main reason to choose it | Better footage and wider framing | Lower cost and more kit flexibility |
These prices describe the comparison period. Check the exact current model and package, since Brave 4 revisions and bundles can differ.
The GoPro looked better and captured more of the scene
Both cameras were sold around 4K recording claims, but the label did not describe the difference in their output. The GoPro’s footage was clearly the cleaner and sharper result to my eye.
The Brave 4 looked softer and more washed out, with exposure that was often too bright. I would judge it from the actual samples rather than assume its highest resolution setting matches the GoPro.
The GoPro also showed a wider view from the same position. That was useful for an action camera in a tight space or mounted close to the subject. It came with more distortion toward the edges, which is part of that look.
If I wanted the best image of these two, I would choose the GoPro. The reason to choose the AKASO would come from its price or practical kit advantages.
Quik added a step, but the result was better
The HERO’s stabilization was applied after recording through GoPro Quik. Copying the original file straight from the card did not give me the same stabilized result.
Once processed in the app, the GoPro clips looked much smoother. That workflow was easiest to accept when I was already editing and exporting on a phone.
The Brave 4 applied electronic stabilization in the camera, but my tested result was jittery. I did not find it useful enough to choose over the GoPro’s processed footage.
GoPro explains the HERO and Quik workflow here. Confirm current device support and allow time for the processing step.
The Brave 4 was easier to equip cheaply
The GoPro kept its controls and package simple. That was convenient when I wanted to start recording without spending much time in menus, but it left fewer settings to adjust.
The Brave 4 kit gave me more mounts, a remote, and more settings. The accessories were basic, but they made it easier to try different mounting positions without immediately buying extra parts.
I also preferred having replaceable batteries for a longer shooting day. My comparison kit appeared to include two. The HERO’s built in battery meant stopping to recharge rather than fitting a charged spare.
Check what is actually included in a current kit. An extra battery or mount is only a saving if it is compatible and something you need.
The housing changes the water and sound tradeoff
GoPro rates the HERO for 5m, or 16ft, without a separate housing. That was more convenient for shallow water and splashes. The roughly 12ft figure mentioned in my video was not the manufacturer rating.
AKASO rates the Brave 4 to 40m, or 131ft, with the specified waterproof case. The bare camera is not waterproof. Check the Brave 4 information for the exact version and housing.
The case added bulk and hurt sound in my use. I would choose by the intended depth and check the housing and seals before putting the camera in the water.
One better camera or several cheaper angles?
A second camera can show something the first angle misses. At the test prices, that gave the Brave 4 a useful role for a workshop, driving setup, or another project where multiple views mattered.
I would choose the GoPro HERO for the better single camera result and the AKASO Brave 4 when the lower total cost and swappable batteries outweighed the image difference.
Compare the full current package, a compatible card, and the work needed to process the footage. I would not buy several cheap cameras if I disliked their output enough that I would never use the extra angles.
My verdict
The GoPro HERO was my pick for most people choosing between these two. Its footage and stabilized result were the reasons to pay more. The Brave 4 was the cheaper way to get more accessories, replaceable batteries, and extra views, with image quality I was less happy with.