GoPro Hero 4K vs Akaso Brave 4 Durability Test: Which Survives?
Published · UpdatedIf you buy through an affiliate link in this article, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The quick answer
Both cameras performed impressively, but the GoPro was clearly superior in structural rigidity. It was tougher when both cameras were used without cases.
The Akaso was surprisingly robust in drop tests and basic abuse, especially inside its protective case. It offers amazing value if you need multiple inexpensive cameras for risky situations.
Watch the full video
Watch the full video on YouTube
Why I chose these two cameras
The GoPro Hero 4K is a budget-friendly, beginner-oriented camera at about half the price of GoPro’s flagship Hero 13 Black. The Akaso Brave 4 costs less than half as much as the Hero 4K, making it an ideal candidate for high-risk situations.
Budget action cameras attract skepticism, but that low cost can make them appealing for rougher adventures.
What happened in every durability test
| Test | GoPro Hero 4K and Akaso Brave 4 |
|---|---|
| Drop test: 3, 6, and 9 ft | Both survived the 3-ft and 6-ft drops easily, with minimal scuffs. At 9 ft, the GoPro’s replaceable lens cracked while the Akaso remained unscathed. Akaso won the drop test. |
| Fire and heat | Both survived flames and a fire-extinguisher blast. Residue left the buttons slightly jammed. |
| Dryer | Both handled the spinning heat. The Akaso’s case popped open, but it kept recording. |
| Car wash | Both survived without damage, even with the GoPro’s already-cracked lens. |
| Screen pressure | The GoPro’s screen cracked but remained mostly functional. The Akaso’s softer screen flexed and cracked internally, losing all rear visibility while its front screen remained intact. |
| Knife and scratches | The GoPro’s tough exterior offered slight scratch resistance. The Akaso’s softer plastic was much easier to scratch and cut. |
| Magnet | No visible effect on either camera’s recording performance. |
| Torch | Sustained heat severely damaged both screens and significantly melted the Akaso’s back. Both continued functioning briefly afterward. |
| Car crush | On grass, the GoPro’s glass lens suffered minor damage and the Akaso was unscathed. On concrete, the GoPro survived two run-overs with structural warping. The Akaso was completely crushed without its case, but still powered on. |
| Freeze | After 15 hours frozen, the GoPro still worked well despite visible condensation inside. |
| Internal moisture | A few drops of water placed directly into the ports killed the GoPro’s functionality after about 5 minutes, showing a vulnerability to internal moisture. |
Which camera proved tougher?
Both performed impressively. The GoPro was clearly superior in structural rigidity and handled multiple run-overs, while the Akaso was surprisingly robust in drops and basic abuse, especially with its protective case.
The GoPro is tougher when both cameras are caseless. The Akaso offers amazing value, particularly if you need multiple inexpensive cameras for risky situations.